FTC says search engine alliance doesn’t breach anti-monopoly law
Google owns the search engine market in North America and most of the English-speaking world.  It’s strong on the continent of Europe.  Here in Japan, however, it’s still second (and spaced back a ways) to Yahoo Japan (note: Yahoo Japan is a separate organization from Yahoo US, although they started out together).  In PRC China, Google is getting strangled by Baidu and the CCP– but that’s another day’s story.

I’ve always marveled at Yahoo Japan’s ability to stay on top of the game.  I’ve noticed most Japanese use Yahoo for their homepage, and the mix of news, sports, weather and search make a nice jumping off place (standard portal stuff).  Culturally, I can only guess as to why this is the case:

  • Did the Japanese embrace the web right at the peak of Yahoo’s power, who simply lucked into first place?
  • Do Japanese prefer clicking through to finding something instead of text searching for it?  (yes)
  • Did the blank white abyss of Google’s homepage just not gel with the Japanese? (likely– behold the Japanese hatred of whitespace in advertising sometime)
  • Did Japanese cell-phone internet access initially skew them toward Yahoo? (also yes– it’s been called the “galapogos effect“)

One other smart play that Yahoo Japan did a long time ago was to launch Yahoo BB, a broadband service launched in 2001 by the communications pioneer Son Masayoshi.  This likely cemented the brand for many Japanese.  Just as the Internet meant AOL for many Americans in the mid- to late-90s, the Internet meant Yahoo for Japanese quickly adopting broadband.

But what happens when the dominant portal cannot get a quality search engine from the US partner anymore?  Develop one in-house?  [That's what the Chinese are trying-- and it's an expensive venture, made possible only by the cheap labour and lavish government funding provided by Beijing.]  No, too expensive.  It’s better to go shopping, but which engine to get?

The Google search engine is the clear leader– everyone knows that (even Japanese users– they simply stay on Yahoo because it’s their default homepage).  The Bing engine may have been a better deal, but likely came with too many strings attached.  Overall, IMHO, this deal seems to be a good idea for both partners: Yahoo gets a quality search engine and can continue to concentrate on it’s portal offerings (news, email, shopping, etc.), while Google finally gets enough penetration in the AdWords market here.

Japanese twitter users at a football game. Source: theHindu.com (I see Ricky from "Better Off Dead" finally made it over to Tokyo)

I increasingly hear from people that they are “giving up” or abandoning twitter. Reasons given are the usual suspects: the signal-to-noise ratio is bad, no quality insights are possible in 140 characters, most tweets just look like shallow self promotion, product company spam. Indeed, there was a golden era (that lasted about 6 weeks) where one could tweet about a company, and receive a prompt response. Now that most companies have installed a twitter-monitoring robot, the service level is quickly degrading right down to the same level as the automatic email responders– or worse– the automated telephone system.

Twitter as a viable business tool is limited; as a marketing blurb tool it’s adequate, but as an ongoing small-talk medium it seems to do pretty well.

As I’ve picked up more and more Japanese friends on twitter, I’ve noticed that it seems to be doing relatively well in Japan (compared to the US market). Why is that? Is it just the stereotype of tech-friendly gadget-wacko Japanese? Or are there some other more specific factors in play? I have absolutely NO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH to back this up, but here are my postulations. Perhaps someone out there can follow up with some actual useful information. I’m throwing this out now to get the conversation started.

Possible technology explanations for better twitter penetration into Japan:

  • Character/language density – One quality of East Asian languages that use Kanji is that many words can become pretty short. In English, “transport” is 9 characters; in Japanese it’s two: 交通. “Tokyo” is 5 characters in English, Japanese is two: 東京. Similar consolidations go for names, places, verbs, etc. Yes, Japanese grammar may get longer, but since when is proper grammar needed in twitter? It seems that the Japanese writing system has an inherent “density” advantage over English.
  • Input tools – Twitter seems tailor made for mobile devices: short, text-centric, quick input. For a networked society that already preferred the mobile phone-based Internet access, twitter drops right into place, often much handier than email. I’ve discussed this before.

Along with the tech explanations, however, there may be some cultural differences in play. These are kinda squishy, so please squint appropriately:

  • Inherent public posting – Most Japanese people I know guard their privacy pretty strongly, but no more so than Americans or Europeans, I think. However, there sometimes is a strong tendency to make idle chit-chat items public out to the group. Japanese people will usually not talk with strangers, unless someone breaks the ice with small talk about the weather or some ramen noodles. Then, the mode shifts to everyone wanting to build a connection with others, and everyone will pipe in their 2 cents. Mind you, this isn’t a political debate or anything concrete, just pichiku-pachiku. Twitter seems to facilitate this nicely. Let me put it this way: that signal-to-noise ratio that drives some of my American friends nuts fits in nicely with the low-level buzz that Japanese ping to each other to reinforce their relationships.
  • ongaeshi 恩返し — My wife (who is Japanese) dislikes instant chat with other Japanese, because of all the built-in politeness requires everyone to say “thank you” and “goodbye” at least 4 or 5 times before closing the conversation. For Japanese, a similar thing looks like it’s occuring in twitter, albeit in asynchronous slow motion: someone follows you, you actually have a bit of an obligation to follow them back. If someone tweets your name, you’ll RT a simple acknowledgement. Taken together, this may push enough people past that critical mass needed to keep a social network flourishing.
  • Lack of a Mixi / Facebook alternativeMixi is pretty noisy and cumbersome compared to Facebook, but has an interface completely native to Japan. Facebook, while cleaner, may be a little too “close” for the idle chit-chat that seems to go on in twitter (this is no different than the US: don’t you hate that guy on Facebook that has hotlinked all his tweets to show up in his friend feed?). Taken together, twitter gives a good outlet for quick updates via mobile phone in a text-rich environment (easily consumed on the train).
  • Son Masayoshi– The great thought leader of Softbank seems to be a prolific twitterer. Along with other leadingtech figures in Japan, Son seems to actually hold ongoing debates and policy discussions via twitter. This openness is refreshing if not counter-intuitive for Japanese business. Put together, twitter looks like the domain of the tech-forward progressives.
© 2010 Dave Jenkins contact me via twitter @davejenk1ns or via email blog at davejenkins dot com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha