Acquisitions are so attractive.

eBay has acquired the open source ecommerce platform Magento.  Personally, I’m a fan of Magento’s functionality and flexibility, and also a big fan of open source applications.  In general, getting acquired by a large company is a good thing, so this should all be beer and skittles, right?

Maybe.

Open source projects rarely do well when acquired by a large company, especially when that company isn’t really lined up behind open source as a culture, nor when the acquired application isn’t in the company’s wheelhouse (sometimes it’s worse when the open source code is in the wheelhouse: witness Oracle’s botching of OpenOffice or near miss with MySQL).  Both demerits are in play with this acquisition: eBay is neither an open source company (like Red Hat or Canonical or Mozilla), and eBay has it’s own ecommerce flea market, not a history of publishing software for users.

eBay is pushing toward its X.Commerce platform: a complete suite for digital marketing and commerce for (what I would assume) mid-market businesses.  This makes sense: eBay has PayPal and also recently acquired GSI, who was known for having a decent client list and a string of warehouses around the country (and internationally) to provide logistics and fulfillment.  I described this as “following Taobao” a few weeks ago.  What GSI wasn’t known for was its ecommerce platform.  I’ve heard from around the community that GSI’s platform was in the middle of a complete tear-down and rebuild, as various bits of acquired code simply weren’t playing nicely with each other.

Questions:

  • Will eBay really move its main commerce branding beyond the flea market image they have (compared to Amazon)?  Can they (without sacrificing the huge cash flow that comes from that flea market)?
  • Does GSI’s platform really suck that bad that Magento is seen as a replacement for it?  If not, how will the GSI platform and Magento play nicely with each other?
  • Magento is open source.  If eBay is serious about keeping control of it, they’ll have to get out there publishing code often.  Otherwise, we’ll just fork it.  Culturally, can eBay pull this off?

I’ve launched a few Magento sites, and I wish them well.  I look forward to seeing what’s coming, but I also will start looking for an alternative if things go pear-shaped.

Nothing up my sleeve, presto!Every year, the geeks declare ‘Year of the Linux Desktop‘.  So often, in fact, that’s it’s become a running gag.  In fact, Apple has made in-roads, and Ubuntu is more popular than ever.  Progress comes in small steps.

We actually may have taken a relatively large step this week: the new Obama adminstration has declared a very open information policy, and their IT structure shows promise in moving this same direction.  While not running Apache and Red Hat yet, they’ve certainly adopted some open social interaction structures.  It would be safe to say that the Obama administration is the best so far at “getting it“.

The missing element here, and the biggest specific step the US Government could make next would be to demand that all documentation be saved in an open format.  Want proof that Microsoft still has a monopoly?  Try sending someone your resume, proposal, or memo in something other than .DOC format.  If the government simply declared that all archives and transactional documents must be saved in .  The ODF is a deeply-flawed, but acceptable good start.  Ultimately, I am not sure the document format will matter.  Within the next 3 years, I bet that words and numbers and tables and figures and images are simply kept in the cloud.  I know I am not the first one to say this– but I can hope that the government would take an active role in pushing documentation into the common external places.  Cloud computing is not a technological hurdle, it’s a social acceptance problem.  I still encounter many people that resist putting things “out there”.  When pressed, there is no specific reason, other than people think the hard drive on their laptop is somehow safer than the huge servers tucked into concrete bunkers somewhere along the Columbia River.

I would hope that the transparency issue continues to gather steam.  I would hope to see the day when the government simply insists that all documentation: project bids, meeting minutes, deliberations, and especially lobbyist efforts, get published in a format that is easily remixed, chewed up, and boiled around in ways that slightly scare the powers-that-be.  We’ve seen a steady march forward with DARPA since the 60s and 70s, early gopher scientific info in the 80s, and then Thomas in the 90s, but the government certainly has dropped the ball in the last 5 years.  If the government can resume its Jeffersonian role in pushing new things for the republic, and allowing the market to fill in where advantageous, then maybe someone’s next interaction with the government will force them into putting things out there for scrutiny (policy or code), and they’ll realize that privacy ultimately depends on open scrutiny, not secrecy.

No home wifi firewall will protect us from an opaque government.

the_leader.jpgOSCommerce, long in the tooth and somewhat widely distributed with 200,000 known stores, has bit the dust.  Evidently, the founder/coder/mad genius at the center of the project could  not manage well: the project never left beta, forums went unmanaged and fell into pr0n, and team after team of frustrated developers quit.  We’ve seen this movie before.

Every successful project, especially in the Open Source world, has a charismatic leader bean at the center.  There’s no money in there, so developers must be drawn in by the concept, but also by the visionary personality of the creator.  Some types have this in spades: Steve Jobs, Dean Kamen, Sergey Brin.  Some have the management chops to a certain level, but ultimately let some self-ascribed non-negotiable prinicple screw up an otherwise solid run: Jerry Yang, Jerry McGuire Sun Microsystems, and a whole zoo of half-assed half-built open source projects.

Someone once told me, “It’s not the strength of the idea, it’s the strength of your ability to convince other people of the strength of that idea.”  The most successful projects that eventually flourished into a viable open source application/platform all made that transition from mad-scientist-in-his-lab to wide corporate/commuinity acceptance because either one of two things happened:

  1. the founder has enough charisma and business acumen to hire and manage around them (and let someone else do the day-to-day)
  2. The founder happens to have a best friend early on in the process to do the business, and all the grovelling, compromising, yelling, coaching, and convincing that is needed to build up and run the circus.

So, If you’ve got that genius scheme out there, and it’s just not getting enough love on Freshmeat, it may be because you’re not sexy enough.  That, or you’re not writing enough polemic diatribes and visionary screeds on your project website.

© 2010 Dave Jenkins contact me via twitter @davejenk1ns or via email blog at davejenkins dot com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha