Loosely translated as: Bring this ring to Mordor's Chevrolet for big savings and free hot dogs!

I just signed up for Shopkick, a micro-couponing site that gives out 2-3 “kicks” every time I view a coupon on their app. The coupons are from stores within 500 meters of where I am right now, along with the promise of 30-50 kicks if I actually cross the threshold of any of these stores, then even more if I take a photo of the lifestyle poster on the back wall of the store… you get the idea.

This comes on the heels of Groupon which was offering deals to get me to sign up, or LivingSocial to introduce new hip stores in the mall with frozen yogurt and yoga classes before we go antiquing over at Pottery Barn.  Two steps behind all of them is Facebook, which keeps hinting at offering some sort of viable credit/coupon mechanism, but somehow fails to achieve any penetration beyond Foramville credits to the addicts. Shopkick, Groupon, LivingSocial and the rest all jump into Facebook’s lap for user registration, and jump right back out again.  Let’s face it: in terms of shopping, Facebook is little more than identity verification and an address-book virus with permissions turned on.

All these sites/apps/gimmicks are trying  for the same thing: peeling away some of the huge dollars that companies will spend to get you to start on the journey that will eventually end up with you opening your wallet.  For those who don’t want to remember MBA school, it goes something like this:

Brand Awareness -> Consideration -> Product Shopping -> Purchase -> Support

Groupon and LivingSocial are doing pretty well on that first step, but as I’ve discussed before, they may be giving away too much for the retailer to maintain any margin, and might actually attract the wrong demographic with massive discounts.  But then again, as my friend Patrick Evans points out, Groupon does ask for the purchase right there (up front), so any margins may be recovered on the breakage.

Shopkick’s approach looks to be different: micro-rewards for micro-steps.  Look at the coupon, 2 points.  Walk by the store in the mall, 2 more points.  Walk into the store, 30 points.  Take a photo of a product, 30 more points.  Actually talk to a sales person, 50 points!  It’s more game-like, and doesn’t require any up-front purchase.  It’s a soft-sell.  What remains to be seen is if people will run around the mall haranguing the sales people all day just to collect points  with zero intent of actually buying anything.  But then again, what else is new?

It’s still a race– no single coupon dealer network has been able to run the table yet.  There is no magic key to unlock all doors; retailers are barely catching on to mobile phones still, let alone really being able to exploit (nicely) a path to get the right coupons to the right customers.  The ring, I think, is still out there somewhere.

Try-N-Save

Marge needs a smart phone first...

Groupon, the group discount site that has spread rapidly thanks to social networks, has seen explosive growth over the last few months.  the company has run extensive TV campaigns in Japan and Europe, as well as even buying some tasteless Super Bowl time last week.  Many of my friends are Groupon users, some are Groupon junkies (I can tell by their constant Facebook bragging/recruiting).  But what about the retailers that are offering these Groupon discounts?  Is it catnip to build buzz, or carrion that invites the vultures?

A common understanding in merchandising is that offering discount products brings in the discount buyers.  Unless your business is All-A-Dollar or Try-N-Save, these are not necessarily the customers you want: discount goods by their very nature have little or no margin, and discount buyers will complain, require service, and generally gum up the fulfillment chain just as much as any other customer (if not more so in some cases).  The business slang for them is ‘bottomfeeders’.  Insinuate whatever you want to from that.  (Please note that I am not calling my good friends ‘bottomfeeders’, they are wonderful people with a savvy sense of finding deals.  I am just relaying the merchandising term.)

So, when would a merchant want to deploy a Groupon strategy?  Here are some points to consider:

Groupon or other clearance discounting is a GOOD IDEA if:

  1. You have a perishable or seasonable product that otherwise will be worthless in a matter of weeks (but not too perishable– a gift food company in Japan is getting sued for using Groupon to send out rancid meats and fish to hundreds of subscribers).
  2. You can run the math, and assuming that Groupon clears out all product, you still cover enough margin to support fulfillment
  3. Margin doesn’t matter on this one, because the word-of-mouth provides a great marketing opportunity.

Aha!  That last one is the siren song for many merchants that decide to go with Groupon.  They figure that if they give away 400 teddy bears or free cocktails or back massages or whatever, the word will spread and their marketing campaign will be off to a running start.  I have no doubt the Groupon salespeople only reinforce this belief.  I would submit that it’s based on some faulty assumptions and likely to get many small businesses in trouble.  Here’s my take on the dangers.

Groupon is NOT A GOOD IDEA for any combinantion of the following factors:

  1. Your business requires the same fulfillment costs no matter who the customer is or how much they pay.  Restaurants fit in this category: a dinner for two requires the same amount of cooking, serving, and cleanup for a couple baying the full $60 as it does for the people using the $25 Groupon.  Unless your restaurant is 80% empty, this is a bad idea.  And if it is 80% empty, I would guess the problems are somewhere else…
  2. The word-of-mouth factor that Groupon supposedly provides is not sustainable or exploitable.  Groupon will bring in a flash mob of a couple hundred customers, and a decent fraction of those customers will brag about the deal on Facebook.  However, unless the merchant has a way to exploit and continue that buzz, the flash mob is exactly that: a flash (and gone).
  3. The flash mob is usually trying to recruit others to participate in the deal– they’re actively telling other bottomfeeders that there is a low-margin item/service for sale at your business.  This will result in bringing in more bottomfeeders as well as possibly damaging your brand.

Discounting is a hard drug to kick.  Groupon is a strong one: used carefully, it can be a kick of adrenaline; used indiscriminately, it’s a quick dose of crack.

See also: One Ring to Rule the Mall

A great article on the Japan cell phone market. I was about to write something similar, but my article would have been much more stupidly speculative. Kudos to Peter.  Having said that, however, I have noticed many many more iPhones on the street than when I looked two years ago.  Moreover, the Docomo (a carrier) Android advertising is in full court press, invoking the Sith Lord himself to show you their product is superior to those hipster brats over at Apple.

Facebook is selling credits at Target and Walmart.  On the face of it, these credits are intended as Christmas stocking stuffers for the Farmville addict in your family (or your boss).  However, it’s not that far of a stretch to see these facebook credits being subsumed into a new payment gateway for mobile phones.

Here’s my points of extrapolation:

  1. Facebook has garnered a significant share of people’s online time.  It’s become a default daily activity for 500M people globally.  That’s one helluva marketplace.
  2. Social Media works better on mobile devices.  Said another way, more people are accessing (read: addicted) to Facebook via their mobile phone.
  3. Mobile phones make a great way to pay for things.  I’ve discussed this before.

It’s a relatively straight line to draw from those three points to having Facebook offer up a PayPal-type functionality where friends exchange credits with each other, and then Facebook then offers up some sort of payment gateway with retailers.  I realize that the “credits” being sold in the stores are going the other way– from physical retail to virtual credits, but it’s easy to see that river flowing the other way once people start to see Facebook as another wallet to store value and trade/give/sell/swap with their friends.

Online gift cards have been a perennial also-ran.  Gift cards are cheesy enough for a store, but coupled with the inhuman touch of an online shopping experience, gift cards have never really worked that well.  However, Facebook is inherently a friend-connection system.  Might that humanization be enough to overcome the inhibitions around gift cards?  Let me ask the question this way: if you could simply run through your facebook friend list, and click “$5″ next to each name, then put the sum total on a credit card, would you do it?

Christmas shopping done in 10 minutes… oh yeah.

The Elvis app from Elvis.com. Yeah, okay-- I might download that...

I’ve often thought about getting a paying job as ‘buzzword compliance officer’ in a tech company, where I could constantly correct people on using the wrong term, but I realize that I would have to be a jerk to everyone around me, and my winning personality wouldn’t be enough to win them over.  Lately I have noticed an increasing intermixing of people saying “mobile app” when they really mean “mobile site”, and visa-versa.  No.  They are not the same.  They often try to accomplish the same end, but there are clear differences, and those differences are important.  Just so we’re clear: a mobile site is a website that you view through safari or opera on your mobile phone; a mobile app is something you have to download from iTunes app store.

So what?

I’ve met many retailers who have a mobile site, and are now trying to go for a mobile app as well.  I get barraged with email offers from design studios who want to build a mobile app for my company (we already have the mobile website).  The confusion between these two terms seems to gin up the demand for more work for these studios.  In many cases, a mobile app is a waste of time and effort, IMHO.  With a mobile website, the customer merely clicks on a link and the functionality comes right up.  This works very well for email marketing messages and facebook or twitter links (social media is stronger on mobile phones than on desktops).  Very quick, very viral, very painless, very nice.  With a mobile app, the potential customer needs to click on the invite to download, go to the app store, click install, wait for the download, click the app open, and then get on with it.  Way too many steps.  Don’t get me wrong, I think mobile apps have their place.

Which one do you need?

You’ll want a mobile site if:

  • your online marketing is primarily selling stuff, like a catalog site with over 2000 SKUs.
  • your customers only purchase from you once or twice each year– if they’re only coming back every few months, they’re not going to give you valuable real estate on that little 3.5″ of glass in their hand.
  • email or social marketing is fairly effective: remember that your customers have only got one or two clicks in them– best to get them to the goods immediately
  • you’ve got no special functionality that requires a great deal of interaction– you just sell stuff or just display content.

You’ll want to go for the mobile app if:

  • your customers are likely to come back at least twice a month.  This is often enough that it overcomes the ‘convenience barrier’ from all those clicks involved with downloading the app the first time.  Netflix works here, as does amazon or mashable.
  • your functionality is quite involved: complex searches (travel sites) or requiring personal information that can be stored in the app.  Kayak understands this, as do most travel site apps.
  • your information is time sensitive, or the customer will respond to a push update.  Woot would work, or steepandcheap.com.
  • your information is easily consumable on a daily basis, and the app can download the information for offline viewing.  That NYT app fits this perfectly
  • your website is geo-sensitive.  I’ve talked about this before, and it holds the key to many multichannel or cross-channel marketing efforts.

So, think carefully.  Do you really need that mobile app?  Or is a mobile version of your website sufficient?

The lazy mans guide to enlightenment

Alas, not available on the Kindle yet.

Not too many months ago, I advised my friend to buy up the .mobi equivalent of all the domains he owned.  We were questioning the value of a mobile-version website, and what content to put there.  I still stand by my recommendations for what thrives on a mobile-version website, but the idea of a separate domain name is completely moribund now.

Here are three reasons why: Multichannel, convenience, and branding.

Multichannel – Your customers will want a consistent experience across channels.  My interactions with The Economist or Toyota Motor Corporation should be pretty similar whether I am coming in through a desktop browser, my iphone, the printed paper, or the showroom (yes– I mixed channels there, that was on purpose).  This point doesn’t have anything to do with the .mobi domain specifically, until you see the next point…

Convenience – Iam lazy.  All customers are.  Personally, I blame a service-oriented economy and our advanced democracy: if I can pay a little money and avoid headaches, I’ll pay just about every time.  Companies know this, and are constantly adjusting those services for which they charge money (because the convenience is valuable but not necessary), and those services which simply make money on their own, because the convenience greases the skids on separating me from my cash.  Mobile websites are definitely in the latter category.  Customers can be anywhere and now simply tap into the endless market with a few keystrokes or voice commands.  This is the crunch point: every additional finger tap required costs people to give up.  Each diad of information imposed upon the customer to remember costs lost sales.  There’s no way I am typing in ‘foo.mobi’ instead of just ‘foo’.  You’re lucky I type anything at all– I want to get to the point where I simply speak ‘foo’ into my phone, or just wave ‘foo’ in front of the camera.

Branding – A domain broker has been calling me every week asking if we are interested in buying a common-word domain related to our industry.  They’re asking a huge amount of money.  Every week, the answer is the same: nope.  Not that I don’t think the domain could get some decent traffic (it could, and I actually calculated out a value).  The problem is that the word is not part of our branding. It’s not consistent.  The same thing goes for the .mobi domains: unless you’re an emo musician from New York, the domain has nothing to do with your brand– the ‘.com’ is the runaway default.

So, get that mobile website up and running.  Make sure it’s convenient, but don’t bother with the .mobi domain, just make sure your IT geeks are smart enough to have an automatic redirect that senses the customer’s device and directs them to the native version.

Comign up next: why you don’t need or want a mobile app.

free_wi_fi_spot.gifI really don’t like shopping.  It used to bring out my inner Marxist, but now it just incurs a low-level buzz in my head.  I’ve found I can keep it under control if I satiate my internet addiction every 10 minutes or so.  Many stores, however, are large window-less Faraday cages, which kills the 3G signal on my phone.  There’s wifi, but it’s not free (it’s usually the corporate offices of the store, and the days of poor security with open enterprise networks are over).  Free wifi in a retail environment is still a rare treat.  Some stores get it, but the vast majority do not.

So, here’s my case for offering free wifi in a retail environment:

  • The percentage of customers with smart phones will only get bigger.  The share of people who will want to check prices, ask-a-friend, or otherwise tweet about their shopping choices will only get bigger.  Do you want to welcome those people, or frustrate them?
  • The potential for data mining about what customers are doing on their smart phones is a huge opportunity.
  • Cost is pretty minimal.  One wifi antenna should do for most stores; Macy’s might need one on each floor.

Risks are fairly minimal, and can be contained with some common sense policies:

  • Put a standard anti-porn filter to mitigate the legal liability of perverts in the store.
  • It’s doubtful someone would go down to the mall to download mp3s– the bandwidth is relatively poor compared to the land-line available at the public library (not that I condone that kind of behaviour).
  • Someone may try to hack into NORAD from the store wifi, but again– internet cafes are better for that because they offer coffee and a table for all your blue-tooth voice encryption equipment (again– I’m not suggesting anything).  Barnes & Noble isn’t a hip enough place to hang out for that long anyway.

So, where’s the upside?  Where’s the money?  It’s in that second point in the first group: the data mining.  There are several forms of valuable bits of data flying around that the store would be well to catch:

  1. Competitor Recon: if Barnes & Noble could know exactly which books people are looking up on Amazon, they could match it against their own conversion rates on those same books.  They would know where they’re losing the sale.  They would also know which books people are viewing on Amazon that B&N doesn’t stock.  This is great informaiton for gauging demand.
  2. Brand Awareness:  how often are REI customers going to REI.com whilst inside the store?  Are they trying to get details on products that the floor peeps aren’t explaining well enough?  Should the floor manager and corporation welcome this kind of look-up? [yes]
  3. Social network awareness: how often do customers ping Facebook that they’re about to buy / just bought a 60″ LCD or a $600 pair of boots?  How often are they tweeting?
  4. Instant couponing: most free wifis have a ‘Conditions of Use’ short login page.  This doesn’t need to have a username and password, just a paragraph that tells the customer we are tracking web traffic anonymously (for all these rich data mining opportunities).  it’s a great opportunity to offer someone some up-sell and cross-sell offers, and maybe an instant coupon with a barcode for 10% they can take up to the register.
  5. These same advantages apply for airports: people love to surf– a gold mine of surfing behaviour lying unexploited because some airport middle manager thinks there’s more money in trying to charge $9.99 for the 2% of people on expense accounts that will fork over that money. [stupid]

Some stores will understand this sooner than others, but in a pretty short window (the next 18-24 months), we should have pretty ubiquitous wifi signals in any urban or suburban environment.  The benefits for free and onmipresent wifi are legion.  The most apparent opportunity is the VoIP, and the chance to show some advertisements.

Google gets this second point clearly– they’ve chosen a target-rich environment (airports), and are handing out free wifi just to get people to surf, and maybe use Google, and maybe click-thru on some AdWords.  In this sense, they’re competing with the idiot box CNN.  If it pays off, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Google putting in free wifi anywhere there are more than p number of people waiting for an average of t amount of time.  The equation would look something like:

Demand (D) = p * t * p(sp)

Opportunity (O) = D * p(G) – wificost

where

p = number of people in a given location

t = average time of wait or lounging around that location

p(sp) = percentage of people with smart phones

p(G) = percentage of people who will go to Google and click on an AdWords

wificost = cost of installing and running wifi base station

In the market, I would not go long on telco stocks, unless they’re leading the pack on opened smart phones.  I would go long on Skype and Cisco, and business intelligence providers, and of course, Google.

mccaskill.jpgWe’re seeing a pattern, in political town halls, industry conferences, and even award shows: the concept of a “panel of experts” at the head of the grand ballroom dispensing wisdom to the masses’ is dead.  I blame mobile phones, but we’ll get to that in a minute.

In August 2009, congressmen and senators scattered out of Washington back to their home districts like so many rats carrying plague.  They had to get Health Care Reform passed, and it was time to bring in the proletariat on the deals they had already been cooking.  The problem is that the prols didn’t play ball.  The quick reaction was to chalk it up to sour grape astro-turfing by the GOP– and once it showed up, I have little doubt they did amplify it wherever possible– but I think that people are just as upset with the Town Hall format as they are with the actual message trying to get preached at them by their “representative”.  Thanks to the internet, the masses are much more connected and have their opinions (right or wrong) much more set before they go to the meeting; thanks to social networks, people now have the baseline expectations to participate in a two-way conversation, not get lectured at and told what to think.  The worst representatives actually yelled at their own constituencies to “shut up and listen“.  Ah, irony.

I saw this same pattern at a recent ecommerce conference in Las Vegas.  Each morning had the usualy Big Name Keynote address which was just as much show-n-tell as it was informative, but then the afternoon sessions consisted of smaller breakout sessions with a small (3-4 people) “panel of experts” sitting at the front of a long ballroom pontificating about some facet of ecommerce chellenges (customer usability, mobile commerce, social networks, etc.).  Here’s the thing– very few people actually listened, I think.  Most people had their heads down checking their email, tweeting out what they were hearing in the meeting, or even tweeting out how they’re not getting anything out of the meeting about how to use Twitter.  Ah, irony.

On the flight home, I downshifted with a Newsweek magazine, and saw an article about the Emmy Awards for TV, and how the awards shows seem increasingly out of touch with the will of the people.  “That makes sense,” I thought to myself: awards shows depend on panels of experts, and that model is becoming increasingly flawed.  Anything that is perceived as a one-way street of information transfer, or has a significant amount of time-lag between the chosen opinion coming down from above and the feedback going back up will lose attention with an increasingly twitchy, real-time community.

So what to do?  Here’s some cheap shots:

  • For political town halls, obviously not everyone can talk, and even then not everyone has a cogent thought, but everyone wants to participate.  What if everyone was handed a chit or poker chip as they came into the room, and each person could either ask their friends for their chips because she wants to speak, or she could hand her poker chip to someone she trusts to voice her opinion.  The microphone would then be ‘auctioned off’ to those with the most poker chips, and passed around as time allowed.
  • For conference meetings, the panels must absolutely integrate real-time tweets, polls, and feedback.  As topics become more tightly defined, the likelihood that smarter people are sitting out in the audience increases.  The poker chips might work here as well.
  • For awards shows– I have no remedy.  They really were just a money-scam from the Big Studio era anyway, it seems, to put butts in seats a second time in November, while allowing actors to negotiate higher salaries because they had won something.  With the social networks, rotten tomatoes, and Mr Dynamite, we all have sufficient information to judge they good films, music, and TV from the dreck.  Those that cannot discern quality content deserve what they get.

hamlet mobileOkay, that was a pretty lame title, but it’s actually the most clear way to express the question: what criteria or elements need to be in place to justify a mobile version of a website?

I was talking with a friend of mine, who recently got the .mobi version of his company’s domain, but hadn’t done anything with it.  He asked for advice, and I offered up the following crude thumbnail that Internet (not web) information can be broken into three main types:

  1. Transactional snippets of information: flight times, restaurant addresses, bank account info, sports scores, short text email, answers to salient questions.  Mobile phones do very well at this– iphone or not– just about everyone with a phone participates in this type of internet transaction.  If you see it that way, the iphone app store really becomes a collection ot targetted info queries all eye-candied up.
  2. Search-centric information: Any business model that centers around the shear number of stuff for sale/rent/download/sharing is really a search-centric model and not a browsing model.  Amazon, zappos, walmart, piratebay, and wikipedia are all search-centric.  So is Yelp.  Notice how all of these operations are either exploiting a mobile strategy fairly well (half-way), or are likely close to one.
  3. Browsing ecommerce information: anything that is a context-rich window-shopping experience doesn’t do well on a mobile phone.  The screen isn’t big enough, and we don’t have the patience to make the Solomon’s decision of either viewing a stripped down version of the site or spend the time endlessly scrolling around to see the website in it’s original layout.  Etsy, Borders magic shelf, Dell, or other ecommerce sites that are inherently dependent on the web-surfing serendipity of the site won’t do well on a mobile phone– at least not without some major rethinking on what works and what doesn’t.

My friend is in an information-sharing business.  He handles sets up relationships between business partners, and brokers deals where he sees possible matches.  His real strength is the depth of information, but he certainly has plenty of small transaction-level updates that would be more valuable if offered in near real-time.  My advice to him was to look through all the activities he does, find those that are in the first bucket, and go with the .mobi version.

jphone.jpgI am not sure if it is a show of weakness, or just another table-upsetting play by our old friend Son Masayoshi, but Softbank is now offering a Free 8GB iPhone as long as you sign up for the two-year data plan.  We’ve seen this model before: Japan pioneered the ‘free crack pipe’ model almost 10 years ago with game consoles and cell phones.  But as functionality, swiveling screens, and other doohickeys made their way into the small devices, prices started to creep up.  Hardware prices took a real hike as the portable chips made jail breaking the phones an assumption, and as all signal carriers standardized.  (In fact, most electronics stores will transfer your chip into your new phone right there when you buy it.)

But Softbank has two things going for it: 1. jailbreaking the iPhone is possible but not easy, 2. the 3G network is still somewhat proprietary.  With these, Softbank can go back to the market-share giveaways that made them famous.  Earlier, I didn’t see the iPhone taking off so strongly inside the Empire.  Now– maybe we’ve got a real race.  In response, competitors could go either way:

a) Use Android to lower the cost of the hardware (also offer for free), and then use VoIP wherever possible to lower radio costs.  However, this doesn’t work because– believe it or not– open wifi networks are not that common in Tokyo

b) Use Android or another OS platform to out-app the iphone (weak strategy)

If the iPhone can get sufficient marketshare, it will be fascinating to see what unexpected apps the Japanese developer community comes up with.

© 2010 Dave Jenkins contact me via twitter @davejenk1ns or via email blog at davejenkins dot com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha