<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave is Somewhere in-between</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/</link>
	<description>Ecommerce Strategy in Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Early Impressions of Google+ &#187; Dave Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/comment-page-1/#comment-42060</link>
		<dc:creator>Early Impressions of Google+ &#187; Dave Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/#comment-42060</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems to be the most direct successor to Google Buzz, and perhaps the surviving nephew of Google Wave.  I don&#8217;t see any hangouts yet, so we&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems to be the most direct successor to Google Buzz, and perhaps the surviving nephew of Google Wave.  I don&#8217;t see any hangouts yet, so we&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Microsoft bought Skype &#187; Dave Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/comment-page-1/#comment-41999</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Microsoft bought Skype &#187; Dave Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/#comment-41999</guid>
		<description>[...] made the first version of this graphic in November 2009.  At the time, I thought Google Wave was going to be one of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made the first version of this graphic in November 2009.  At the time, I thought Google Wave was going to be one of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Wave is Dead. Ride On? &#187; Dave Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/comment-page-1/#comment-38537</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Wave is Dead. Ride On? &#187; Dave Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/#comment-38537</guid>
		<description>[...] all heard that Google is abandoning development of Google Wave.  From what I know of my developer friends, however, it made a decent remote office co-development [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all heard that Google is abandoning development of Google Wave.  From what I know of my developer friends, however, it made a decent remote office co-development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy K</title>
		<link>http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/comment-page-1/#comment-32499</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davejenkins.com/2009/11/05/google-wave-is-somewhere-in-between/#comment-32499</guid>
		<description>The Wave of hybrid communication may have arrived and GoogleWave might be our generation&#039;s Prius. I recall (dating myself now) a day when CB radios were ubiquitous. We often &#039;chatted&#039; with CB&#039;ers for the sake of using this newly discovered and affordable technology without having much purpose for our conversations. We do that now with IM formats, telling people what direction we are headed on the highway or letting your friends what the score is at the ball game. I get bored fast these days (as I did back then too). My old CB quickly found its way into the garage, and when it failed to sell at the garage sale, it was thrown into the trash heap. New forms of communication and entertainment emerged (Computer Games, Email, Cell Phones). My old phones and video games all get recycled now instead of thrown into the trash. They say that number of quality friends/contacts one has remained unchanged (about 3) over the last few generations, regardless of advances in technology/software. That&#039;s hard to believe, but this statistic is exactly correct in my life. I hope that whatever the medium of choice for communication, that it stays that way, not fewer, not more.
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wave of hybrid communication may have arrived and GoogleWave might be our generation&#8217;s Prius. I recall (dating myself now) a day when CB radios were ubiquitous. We often &#8216;chatted&#8217; with CB&#8217;ers for the sake of using this newly discovered and affordable technology without having much purpose for our conversations. We do that now with IM formats, telling people what direction we are headed on the highway or letting your friends what the score is at the ball game. I get bored fast these days (as I did back then too). My old CB quickly found its way into the garage, and when it failed to sell at the garage sale, it was thrown into the trash heap. New forms of communication and entertainment emerged (Computer Games, Email, Cell Phones). My old phones and video games all get recycled now instead of thrown into the trash. They say that number of quality friends/contacts one has remained unchanged (about 3) over the last few generations, regardless of advances in technology/software. That&#8217;s hard to believe, but this statistic is exactly correct in my life. I hope that whatever the medium of choice for communication, that it stays that way, not fewer, not more.<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

